jeffrey rignall testimony transcript

• 8 September 2023

Wilder, however, claims that the police simply chose to ignore what happened because Rignall was gay. When asked on cross-examination whether defendant was indistinct or contradictory, Dr. Reifman replied: "He tries to obfuscate, or tries to present a picture that is not clear." She testified that the basement was locked and the children were never permitted to go down there unless accompanied by a parent. "Justice on Trial" will examine controversial topics often subject to . Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General, of Springfield, and Richard M. Daley, State's Attorney, of Chicago (William J. Kunkle, Jr., Chief Deputy State's Attorney, and Michael E. Shabat, Joan S. Cherry, James S. Veldman and Kevin Sweeney, Assistant State's Attorneys, of counsel), for the *18 People. As John Wayne Gacys basement crawl space was running out of room for the bodies of his victims, a man named Jeffrey Rignall survived a horrific encounter with the serial killer. He stated that he had graves dug so that he would have graves available. Defendant has also argued that the death penalty statute is unconstitutional because it fails to provide adequate comparative review procedures. We agree with the People that the defendant's request was, in effect, an attempt to substitute public opinion polls for *44 the process of voir dire. Are you a coward? Defendant has listed only one instance where his request for additional specific questions on exposure to news accounts was denied. Defense counsel could have questioned the expert as to particular symptoms and then asked if that was consistent with the diagnosis of "borderline." (Ill. Rev. The circuit court also permitted the attorneys to suggest additional questions when they felt the court's questioning was inadequate. Edward Lynch, a classmate of Donald Vorhees, testified that while he was at defendant's house in Iowa defendant threatened him with a carving knife and forced him into his bedroom. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. Fourth, certain articles compared defendant to other notorious mass murderers. She stated that defendant never hid the fact that he was bisexual. 1977, ch. Rather, this voluminous record is replete with indications that trial counsel expended considerable effort in seeking out expert witnesses for defendant and preparing for the cross-examination of the People's experts. Defendant argues that equivalent diagnoses were contained in earlier drafts of DSM I and DSM II. Michel Ried testified that he was a homosexual and met defendant in "New Town." The two Chicago newspapers carried many of these first two types of articles when the story first broke, but discontinued them a week to a month later. Defendant also contends that he should have been present when the record was corrected to show that on March 13, 1980, when the death penalty verdict was returned, defendant waived his right to a presentence investigation and requested the immediate imposition of sentence. We find, however, that since the jurors, in the absence of a stipulation, could consider all the evidence presented at trial in their deliberations upon the death penalty, it was not necessary to obtain defendant's permission for them to do so. Two items, a receipt for film left to be developed at Nisson's drug store and a Maine West High School class ring, are of particular significance. On these facts, in view of the discretion vested in the circuit court in the examination of jurors, we find no reversible error. Defendant argues that the assistant State's Attorney misstated the test for insanity when he stated: "But because he is abnormal doesn't mean that he doesn't know the difference between right and wrong. Dr. Cavanaugh stated that this indicated a degree of sophistication, and *66 that defendant insisted that the experts had to play the game by his rules. Dr. Rappaport testified concerning speech patterns which demonstrate "loose associations" or inappropriate affect, and despite objections by the prosecution, in many instances Dr. Rappaport repeated defendant's statements to him. Rather, the People assert, all of the People's experts stated that he was suffering "from a mere personality or character disorder.". We note that a defendant normally speaks through his attorney, who stands in the role of agent, and defendant, by permitting his attorney, in his presence and without objection, to immediately proceed *101 to a sentencing hearing is deemed to have acquiesced in, and to be bound by, his actions. The Des Plaines police department suspected that defendant was involved in Piest's disappearance. He stated that, shortly before he was arrested, defendant came into the gas station and passed a bag with three rolled cigarettes to one of his employees. Poor man went through too much 32 fairyflaggirl 1 yr. ago yep. In rebuttal, Dr. Jan Fawcett, a psychiatrist, also opined that the problem with psychodynamic or psychoanalytic *68 theory in determining criminal responsibility is that it was used to explain behavior retrospectively as if no other outcome could occur. Defendant argues that the murder of Timothy O'Rourke was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt and that this erroneous conviction necessitates a remand for a new sentencing hearing. Defendant argues that such a stipulation was the functional equivalent of a guilty plea and defendant should have been personally addressed to ascertain his understanding of the stipulation and its consequences. Alleged incompetency arising from a matter of trial tactics or strategy will not support a claim of ineffective representation. For the reasons stated, the judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed. 38, par. Additionally, we also fail to see the relevance in the evidence of the victims' surviving siblings or that Piest wanted to make Eagle Scout "badly" and similar information. Defendant's argument, however, concerns the persuasiveness of the assistant State's Attorney's argument, not its impropriety. The assistant State's Attorney repeatedly stated the proper test, and the jury was not misled by this one statement. jeffrey rignall testimony transcript - mancrft.com JUSTICE SIMON, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Defects in a presentence investigation report may be waived (People v. Godinez (1982), 91 Ill. 2d 47, 56-57; People v. Meeks (1980), 81 Ill. 2d 524, 533-34), and no objection was raised when the court proceeded to immediate sentencing on all the charges. 42 Ill. 2d 425, 435-36. The People correctly point out that defendant neither moved to sequester the jury over this time, nor later asked for a mistrial, nor was it shown that any prejudicial media coverage occurred during the time in question. Jeffrey Rignall was visiting Chicago from Louisville, Kentucky, in March 1978. The doctor performing the autopsy listed the cause of death as "apparent drowning."

Wisconsin Parade Video Unedited, Met Kalfou Offerings, Rocky Horror Picture Show Monologues From The Play, How To Become A Health Inspector In Texas, Articles J